2018
DOI: 10.5505/pajes.2018.65290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of algae related taste and odor problem in drinking water

Abstract: İçme suyu, su kaynağından tüketici musluğuna ulaştırılana kadar birçok aşamadan geçmektedir. Suyun kalitesi; su kaynağındaki su kalitesine, arıtma tesisinde uygulanan proseslere ve su dağıtım şebekesinin durumuna bağlıdır. Arıtılmış suda istenmeyen tat ve koku, tüketicideki içilebilir su algısını etkilemekte ve tüketicinin musluk suyu tüketimi ile sağlık riskini ilişkilendirmesine sebep olabilmektedir. Bu durum, su temini tesislerine olan tüketici güveninin azalmasına yol açabilmektedir. Söz konusu sorunun çöz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The compounds produced by algae such as geosmin and 2‐methylisoborneol have been detected at levels well above threshold concentrations (10 ng L –1 ) impacting end users. [ 7 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compounds produced by algae such as geosmin and 2‐methylisoborneol have been detected at levels well above threshold concentrations (10 ng L –1 ) impacting end users. [ 7 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as a response to environmental factors such as light, temperature etc., MIB production mechanism responds faster in hours while GEO production mechanism response can take days (Watson et al 2016, Watson & Jüttner 2019). The first challenge for monitoring and treatment studies is the estimation of GEO and MIB production time and concentration levels (Fakıoğlu et al 2018). The second challenge is the presence of different producer groups in the same habitat such as Cyanobacteria, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Ascomycota (Mattheis & Roberts 1992, Dickschat et al 2005, Cane et al 2006, Watson et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one of the main producers, Cyanobacteria has a wide range of distribution in different water sources (lakes, reservoirs, rivers and marine environment) in Turkey (Akcaalan et al 2009, Akcaalan et al 2014a, Akcaalan et al 2014b, Koker et al 2017). Studies on their presence and toxin production have increased in recent years, but there is a limited number of studies on cyanobacteria-associated taste and odour problems (Albay et al 2009, Fakıoğlu et al 2018. In addition to this, MIB and GEO have been reporting in drinking water quality reports of İstanbul, especially in summer periods which consequently lead to costly water treatment projects based on granular activated carbon (İSKİ 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%