2013
DOI: 10.11118/actaun201361051339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of airborne laser scanning data for tree parameters and terrain modelling in forest environment

Abstract: MIKITA TOMÁŠ, KLIMÁNEK MARTIN, CIBULKA MILOŠ: Evaluation of airborne laser scanning data for tree parameters and terrain modelling in forest environment. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 2013, LXI, No. 5, pp. 1339-1347 The aim of this article is to analyse possibilities of airborne laser scanning (ALS) data utilization in forestry, especially for the purposes of terrain modelling and for forest inventory (determination of forest height, diameter breast height and volume -… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, airborne laser scanning (ALS), also referred to as airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR), has become established as a novel technology for estimating forest inventory attributes (e.g., tree or stand height and diameter, basal area, volume -Hyyppä & Inkinen 1999, Mikita et al 2013. The capability of ALS to penetrate tree crowns enables the collection of data on tree and stand characteristics that would otherwise require on-site measurement (Sheridan et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, airborne laser scanning (ALS), also referred to as airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR), has become established as a novel technology for estimating forest inventory attributes (e.g., tree or stand height and diameter, basal area, volume -Hyyppä & Inkinen 1999, Mikita et al 2013. The capability of ALS to penetrate tree crowns enables the collection of data on tree and stand characteristics that would otherwise require on-site measurement (Sheridan et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other modern methods of remote sensing, such as aerial LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), reach a significantly lower accuracy with a RMSE of 0.103 m and with a lower density of points around 1-10 points per m 2 (Mikita et al 2013). Ahamed et al (2000) presented that the LiDAR accuracy of each point on the ground is approximately 15 cm in the vertical, and 1.0 m in the horizontal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terrestrial surveying based on GNSS and total station measurements in 4 sampling plots in an area of 1 hectare proved the quality of DTM and resulted in an observational error of −0.623 ± 0.12 m (Mikita et al, 2013). Therefore this relatively high systematic bias was eliminated by deducting the diff erence.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CHM was smoothed with a Gaussian fi lter to remove small variations on the crown surface. The degree of smoothness was determined on the basis of the most precise detection of tree heights from ALS in comparison to fi eld measured values (Mikita et al, 2013). In the case of this study, we used the Focal Statistic tool of ArcGIS 10.2 with defi ned rectangle surrounding of a kernel of 5 × 5 pixels.…”
Section: : Location Of Tfe Křtinymentioning
confidence: 99%