2011
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Agents to Reduce Infarct Size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, evidence strongly suggests that erythropoiesis stimulating agents might also carry a cardiovascular risk in the short term 5 . Contrary to the authors’ opinions, short‐term clinical events appear in patients that received rHuEpo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, evidence strongly suggests that erythropoiesis stimulating agents might also carry a cardiovascular risk in the short term 5 . Contrary to the authors’ opinions, short‐term clinical events appear in patients that received rHuEpo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Th erefore, evidence strongly suggests that erythropoiesis stimulating agents might also carry a cardiovascular risk in the short term. 5 Contrary to the authors' opinions, short-term clinical events appear in patients that received rHuEpo. In this setting, more data are needed to support erythropoiesis stimulation, increasing hematocrit, and blood viscosity, in patients with high risk of cardiovascular events.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This difference is potentially important because two‐dimensional echocardiography does not have the same accuracy as CMR for ejection fraction determination . In fact, CMR assessments of infarct size and LVEF are the preferred surrogate endpoints for contemporary STEMI trials . No significant differences were noted in rates of reinfarction, stent thrombosis, and target vessel revascularization in our meta‐analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…73 More recently, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging has been used to quantify infarct size, and this tool has been shown to be useful in early clinical trials. 74 An advantage of using infarct volumes in stroke is that it shows the absolute treatment effect of IAT without confounders in the ensuing 89 days that may affect 90-day mRS. Nevertheless, there are still concerns about missing data in patients who die before magnetic resonance image acquisition or those unable to undergo magnetic resonance imaging because of pacemakers or other implants.…”
Section: Infarct Volume As a Surrogate For Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%