Proceedings. Eleventh International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management
DOI: 10.1109/ssdm.1999.787619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of ad hoc OLAP: in-place computation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea of grouping sets was carried over to data cubes by Ross et al [32]. EMF-SQL (extended multi-feature syntax) [6,7,28] extends the multi-feature syntax by permitting the definition of customized aggregate conditions using the definition of grouping variables.…”
Section: Aggregate Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of grouping sets was carried over to data cubes by Ross et al [32]. EMF-SQL (extended multi-feature syntax) [6,7,28] extends the multi-feature syntax by permitting the definition of customized aggregate conditions using the definition of grouping variables.…”
Section: Aggregate Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each distinct value s of column state we should define a set variable as the rows of table Sales having state=s and month=1. A grouping variable, first introduced in [17] and then refined in [10,11,28], depicts precisely this idea. A grouping variable is attached to a group by clause and for each distinct value of the grouping attributes a new set variable is instantiated.…”
Section: Syntax Of Grouping Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dependency analysis between correlated aggregates has been treated in [11,29,16] and many ideas are common. However it is valuable to formulate this concept as an algebraic transformation.…”
Section: Combination Of Md-joinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EMF query evaluation algorithm in Algorithm 4.1 is a naive implementation-many optimizations can be made (presented in length in [5]) that greatly improve performance. For example, Algorithm 4.1 can become very expensive if the mf-structure has a large number of entries, since on each scan, for every tuple, all H's entries are examined, resulting in an implicit nested-loop join.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extended multi-feature SQL [4][5][6] introduces a minimal, yet powerful extension of SQL, based on the concept of grouping variable [13]. EMF SQL has proven useful in expression and evaluation of complex OLAP queries in various domains (e.g.…”
Section: Introducing Extended Multi-feature Syntaxmentioning
confidence: 99%