2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae diagnostic tests using samples derived from experimentally infected pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, pigs infected with serovars 5 and 12 did not seroconvert, and polymerase chain reaction performed on tonsils at termination of that earlier study was negative. 7 Therefore, it is possible that the animals in the present study remained uninfected perhaps due to a lower dose than required to induce infection with these particular serovars, explaining the lack of detection of antibodies. In the present study, successful infection and lack of interference by the antimicrobial treatment was confirmed by assays targeting antibodies against ApxI and ApxII or serotype-specific assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Specifically, pigs infected with serovars 5 and 12 did not seroconvert, and polymerase chain reaction performed on tonsils at termination of that earlier study was negative. 7 Therefore, it is possible that the animals in the present study remained uninfected perhaps due to a lower dose than required to induce infection with these particular serovars, explaining the lack of detection of antibodies. In the present study, successful infection and lack of interference by the antimicrobial treatment was confirmed by assays targeting antibodies against ApxI and ApxII or serotype-specific assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In addition, optimised PCR conditions have been developed for specific respiratory pathogens including PRRSV [22, 23], SIV [24, 25] and PCV2 [26, 27]. Most focus has been on viral rather than bacterial pathogen detection in OF but the knowledge base is increasing for Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae , Haemophilus parasuis [28] and M. hyo [29–31]. In addition, the OF platform relies on a pooled sample at pen-level from animals that may or may not interact individually with the sampling rope and may themselves be shedding pathogen, or have antibody titres, at differing levels thereby raising potential constraints related to sensitivity of the test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. pleuropneumoniae can infect pigs of all ages, but clinical disease is mainly seen in growing pigs Ͼ12 weeks of age (2,3). The disease is transmitted by the aerosol route or by direct contact and is often highly contagious.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different ELISAs, those targeting ApxIV toxin to quantify circulating levels of the antibody to A. pleuropneumoniae (20), those targeting ApxI, ApxII, or ApxIII for the detection of specific antibodies to Apx exotoxins (21), those targeting capsular polysaccharides of A. pleuropneumoniae to identify antibodies against groups of its serovars (22), and serovar-specific ELISAs based on long-chain lipopolysaccharides (23) have been widely used and offer better sensitivities and specificities than the CFT. It has also been demonstrated that ELISAs utilizing different antigens or that are performed under different assay conditions may have conflicting results and cross-reactions between A. pleuropneumoniae serovars and other bacterial species, and this may be problematic (2,3). The test specificity greatly varies depending on the serologic assay performed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%