2021
DOI: 10.52547/wjps.10.2.67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) as a Scaf-fold for Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Transfer in the Rat Model

Abstract: BACKGROUNDThis study was designed for the evaluation of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) as a scaffold for adipose-derived stem cell transferring in the rat model. METHODS This experimental study was done in the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results reported more significant signs of repair than those reported in a study on the same biomodel using decellularized fetal bovine skin substitute with autologous skin cell suspension [ 69 ], indicating that the wound closed in approximately 42 days after treatment and according to the histological result, the immature epithelium and presence of inflammatory cells in the wound treated with decellularized skin substitute were observed at 28 days. Likewise, the skin repair potential of construct 1 and hADM described here was higher than similar strategies evaluated in different animal models [ 67 , 70 , 71 ]. Although we did not use a positive control such as Integra™ seeded with keratinocytes in our in vivo assay, previous studies have shown that this alternative, evaluated in a porcine biomodel, fails to achieve epithelial stratification [ 72 ], and also produces hyperkeratinized scarring at week 8 of evaluation [ 73 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Our results reported more significant signs of repair than those reported in a study on the same biomodel using decellularized fetal bovine skin substitute with autologous skin cell suspension [ 69 ], indicating that the wound closed in approximately 42 days after treatment and according to the histological result, the immature epithelium and presence of inflammatory cells in the wound treated with decellularized skin substitute were observed at 28 days. Likewise, the skin repair potential of construct 1 and hADM described here was higher than similar strategies evaluated in different animal models [ 67 , 70 , 71 ]. Although we did not use a positive control such as Integra™ seeded with keratinocytes in our in vivo assay, previous studies have shown that this alternative, evaluated in a porcine biomodel, fails to achieve epithelial stratification [ 72 ], and also produces hyperkeratinized scarring at week 8 of evaluation [ 73 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…(англ. M. Jahanian et al) [32] Крысы Аппликация СКЖТ в составе ацеллюлярного дермального матрикса на полнослойную рану В нашем исследовании использовались внутрикожные инъекции в раневое ложе на глубину до 2 мм (мезотерапия) и подкожные инъекции вокруг и под дно раны. Глубина внутрикожных инъекций выбрана минимальная, чтобы приблизить ММСК к зоне регенеративных процессов.…”
Section: мышиunclassified
“…Опыт нанесения механически обработанной СВФ на раневую поверхность ран в целях стимуляции процесса регенерации ран свидетельствует о целесообразности этого метода только в отношении ограниченных по площади ран с неоднородным рельефом дна [34]. Ферментативно обработанная СВФ оптимальна для лечения обширных ран, однако для фиксации стволовых клеток на поверхности донорской раны необходимо применение дополнительных агентов, таких как фибриновый клей или матрицы-носители, которые сами могут оказывать непосредственное влияние на процесс регенерации [24,28,31,32].…”
Section: мышиunclassified