2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41405-021-00077-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of OneCeph digital cephalometric analysis in comparison with manual cephalometric analysis—a cross-sectional study

Abstract: Introduction Lateral cephalometric analysis continues to be one of the gold standard diagnostic aids in orthodontics, with various software available to enhance this. Aim This study was done to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of linear and angular measurements obtained from OneCeph digital cephalometric tracing and manual tracings in lateral cephalometry. Methodology This is a cross-sectional stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, both examiners had ICC medians for all three types of cephalometric analysis methods higher than 0.75, indicating that all methods had good (between 0.75 and 0.9) to excellent (greater than 0.9) intra-examiner reliability [ 34 ]. The ICCs are similar to or higher than those reported in previous publications by other groups [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ], demonstrating consistency and accuracy of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, both examiners had ICC medians for all three types of cephalometric analysis methods higher than 0.75, indicating that all methods had good (between 0.75 and 0.9) to excellent (greater than 0.9) intra-examiner reliability [ 34 ]. The ICCs are similar to or higher than those reported in previous publications by other groups [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ], demonstrating consistency and accuracy of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Cephalometric analysis is widely used for the pre-orthodontic assessment [ 26 ], mandibular growth pattern, cervical vertebrae assessment [ 27 ], upper airway obstruction and adenoid hypertrophy [ 28 ]. Recent developments have also linked it with evaluating the hyoid and tongue position [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were ten papers published which examined the effectiveness and costeffectiveness of health technologies and inter ventions. 19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28 This included a protocol on a study into water fluoridation, 20 a scoping review for salivary COVID-19 diagnostics 21 and a pilot trial for the use of propolis following head and neck radiotherapy. 22 As noted above, print journals such as the BDJ are aimed at a wide readership and are less able to prioritise publishing protocols and early results.…”
Section: Health Technology Assessment/clinical Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%