2013
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61266-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a voucher programme in reducing inequities in maternal health utilisation in Cambodia: a quasi-experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although delivery costs are less expensive at the TBTC than at the hospital, continued efforts are needed to reduce costs further through the national health insurance system and to facilitate health facility access among rural families with low incomes. Voucher programs used in other settings [11,12] might be appropriate in this setting to offset the costs of facility delivery and transport.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although delivery costs are less expensive at the TBTC than at the hospital, continued efforts are needed to reduce costs further through the national health insurance system and to facilitate health facility access among rural families with low incomes. Voucher programs used in other settings [11,12] might be appropriate in this setting to offset the costs of facility delivery and transport.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] Although there is evidence indicating that voucher programs can increase the use of subsidized health services, there is a lack of evidence regarding the impact of the voucher on reducing inequitable utilization trends between rich and poor. 4,10,[16][17][18][19] Primary maternal health services continue to favor wealthier households in LMIC. [20][21][22] In Bangladesh, 90% of deliveries in the lowest quintile occur at home, whereas only 40% of deliveries in the highest quintile occur at home.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13–15 Although there is evidence indicating that voucher programs can increase the use of subsidized health services, there is a lack of evidence regarding the impact of the voucher on reducing inequitable utilization trends between rich and poor. 4,10,16–19…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current evidence suggests that demand-side financing vouchers for FP likely increases use of modern contraceptive methods [ 24 – 27 , 32 ]. By targeting underserved groups, vouchers ensure subsidies reach the disadvantaged and are not absorbed by those with greater access to resources [ 33 , 34 ]. In addition, vouchers can be considered as a stepping-stone toward social health insurance, for example vouchers may help governments develop their capacity to purchase health services (accreditation, pricing, contracting, quality assurance, monitoring, claims processing, and reimbursement) and to target subsidies to underserved populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%