2011
DOI: 10.1080/14786435.2010.526646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a steady-state test of foam stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The foaming capacity and stability apparatus used in this study was adapted from similar studies (Ross and Ellis, 1992;Bindal et al, 2002;Hutzler et al, 2011). This test was selected to evaluate the foaminess, or foaming tendency of the liquid as well as the stability of any foam generated.…”
Section: Foaming Capacity and Stability Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The foaming capacity and stability apparatus used in this study was adapted from similar studies (Ross and Ellis, 1992;Bindal et al, 2002;Hutzler et al, 2011). This test was selected to evaluate the foaminess, or foaming tendency of the liquid as well as the stability of any foam generated.…”
Section: Foaming Capacity and Stability Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The later contributions of Gol'dfarb et al [7], Verbist et al [8], Koehler et al [9], Cox et al [10] and Saint-Jalmes & Langevin [11] developed the field in its full generality. This formulation has been applied with qualitative and semi-quantitative success to a range of drainage experiments, including 'free drainage' and 'forced drainage' [12,13], and foamability tests [14] in a single column. (For a more thorough summary of early foam drainage theory, see the work of Weaire et al [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In polydisperse foams the value of φ ⋆ l decreases only slightly from 0.36 for the modest polydispersities which are typically obtained from many experimental foaming techniques [13,14] The steady-state height of the foam column as a function of the bubble velocity is determined by applying proper boundary conditions for the liquid fraction at the bottom (h f = 0) and top (h f = h) of the foam column. If the bubbles at the bottom of the column are in contact with a pool of liquid, their packing will resemble that of a dense packing of hard spheres, and therefore the liquid fraction at the bottom is set to φ(h f = 0) = φ 0 ≈ 0.36 and at the top to φ(h f = h) = φ h , where φ h is a finite critical liquid fraction below which the films collapse [15]. This value must be determined by experimental observation.…”
Section: Measurable Foam Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%