2005
DOI: 10.1051/apido:2005025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a standard artificial flower design to feed individual bees known amounts of pesticides

Abstract: -We investigated the possibility of feeding individual bees known amounts of pesticides on a standard artificial flower with or without scent. We tested experienced and naive (without foraging experience) Osmia lignaria and Megachile rotundata females, and experienced Apis mellifera foragers, and trained (exposed to the artificial flower for 24 h) and untrained individuals of the three species. We also fed untrained individuals of all three species with feeding units made with natural flowers (Ladurner et al.,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the mortality and consumption data obtained within the exposure period, the relative daily consumption (i.e., the weight of consumed sucrose-solution per weight unit of the animal per day (g × g −1 × day −1 ) of each bee was determined. Due to the known difficulties in feeding individual solitary bees under laboratory cage conditions [ 33 , 50 ] we opted for a conservative approach of excluding bees that may have died due to starvation. Therefore, we calculated the average relative daily consumption of sucrose-solution for the control bees and set the minimum consumption threshold at their lower 5th percentile.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the mortality and consumption data obtained within the exposure period, the relative daily consumption (i.e., the weight of consumed sucrose-solution per weight unit of the animal per day (g × g −1 × day −1 ) of each bee was determined. Due to the known difficulties in feeding individual solitary bees under laboratory cage conditions [ 33 , 50 ] we opted for a conservative approach of excluding bees that may have died due to starvation. Therefore, we calculated the average relative daily consumption of sucrose-solution for the control bees and set the minimum consumption threshold at their lower 5th percentile.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For bumble bees we used workers, males and gynes (i.e., unmated queens), hereby referred to as queens, whereas for O. bicornis we used males and females. Bumble bee experiments were designed following OECD protocols 30 , 31 , while O. bicornis was tested following published 76 and ring-tested protocols 32 , as an OECD protocol for this latter species is not yet available.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attraction of social bees (e.g. Apis mellifera and Tetragonula carbonaria ) to our artificial flowers is particularly encouraging as bees usually require pre‐training in order to recognise artificial flowers as food sources (Ladurner et al., 2005; Rivest et al., 2017). We suggest that artificial flowers offer a replicable, controllable and scalable way to study decision making by wild flower‐visiting insects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%