1991
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4347(91)80069-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a simple plasma catecholamine extraction procedure prior to high-performance liquid chromatography and electrochemical detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference between the two methods was the elution solution for the extraction of CA from the alumina. By using a mixture of methanol and acetic acid (98:2, v/v, pH 2.8) in place of 0.1 M perchloric acid (pH 1.2) by Ganhao et al [9]. as the elution solution, the recovery and reproducibility of plasma CA analysis was improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The main difference between the two methods was the elution solution for the extraction of CA from the alumina. By using a mixture of methanol and acetic acid (98:2, v/v, pH 2.8) in place of 0.1 M perchloric acid (pH 1.2) by Ganhao et al [9]. as the elution solution, the recovery and reproducibility of plasma CA analysis was improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extraction procedure used in this study was a modification of the method described by Ganhao et al [9]. The main difference between the two methods was the elution solution for the extraction of CA from the alumina.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations