Evaluation of a Short-Range Multimodel Ensemble System

Abstract

Forecasts from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction's experimental short-range ensemble system are examined and compared with a single run from a higher-resolution model using similar computational resources. The ensemble consists of five members from the Regional Spectral Model and 10 members from the 80-km Eta Model, with both in-house analyses and bred perturbations used as initial conditions. This configuration allows for a comparison of the two models and the two perturbation strategies, as well as a preliminary investigation of the relative merits of mixed-model, mixed-perturbation ensemble systems. The ensemble is also used to estimate the short-range predictability limits of forecasts of precipitation and fields relevant to the forecast of precipitation.Whereas error growth curves for the ensemble and its subgroups are in relative agreement with previous work for large-scale fields such as 500-mb heights, little or no error growth is found for fields of mesoscale interest, such as convective indices and precipitation. The difference in growth rates among the ensemble subgroups illustrates the role of both initial perturbation strategy and model formulation in creating ensemble dispersion. However, increase spread per se is not necessarily beneficial, as is indicated by the fact that the ensemble subgroup with the greatest spread is less skillful than the subgroup with the least spread.Further examination into the skill of the ensemble system for forecasts of precipitation shows the advantage gained from a mixed-model strategy, such that even the inclusion of the less skillful Regional Spectral Model members improves ensemble performance. For some aspects of forecast performance, even ensemble configurations with as few as five members are shown to significantly outperform the 29-km Meso-Eta Model.

Ozone predictabilities due to meteorological uncertainties in the Mexico City basin using ensemble forecasts

“…The ensemble mean was found to be more accurate than an individual model realization, when verified for numerous cases. NWP ensembles could be implemented by using different model initial conditions Kalnay, 1993, 1997;Molteni et al, 1996), different parameterizations within a single model (Stensrud et al, 1998), different numerical schemes (Thomas et al, 2002), and different models (Hou et al, 2001;Wandishin et al, 2001). This allows the ensemble to consider different sources of uncertainties.…”

Regional Climate Modeling: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects

“…Wandishin et al (2001) showed that an ensemble with five members at 80 km horizontal resolution could significantly outperform a single higher-resolution 29-km simulation in precipitation forecasts. The superensemble technique can yield forecasts with considerable reduction in forecast error compared to the errors of the member models, or the simple ensemble mean (Krishnamurti et al 1999).…”

Ensemble flood forecasting based on operational forecasts of the regional Eta EPS in the Taquari-Antas basin

“…In this approach, a set of possible future states of the atmosphere can be provided through small perturbations in the initial conditions of a control forecast (BUIZZA, 1997), different physical representations and changes in parameterization schemes of atmospheric models (STENSRUD; BAO;WARNER, 2000;WANDISHIN et al, 2001), or combination of previous forecasts with the most recent ones (DIETRICH et al, 2008;MACHADO et al, 2010). These systems have achieved consistent recognition for the improvement of weather forecast skill, leading hydrological research towards the development of Hydrological Ensemble Prediction Systems -HEPS (e.g.…”