2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.09.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a self-fitting, shape memory polymer scaffold in a rabbit calvarial defect model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CT examination at the last follow-up shows incomplete healing in both untreated and scaffold-treated defects. However, relevant differences are observed in the assessment of the area covered by mineralised tissue, in agreement with similar studies [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CT examination at the last follow-up shows incomplete healing in both untreated and scaffold-treated defects. However, relevant differences are observed in the assessment of the area covered by mineralised tissue, in agreement with similar studies [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…At the end of the procedure, each subject had two bone defects. One defect was treated by applying the scaffold while the other was left to heal spontaneously [ 18 ]. No suturing of the periosteum is performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both star -PCL ( T m = ∼45 °C, compressive modulus = ∼3.57 MPa) and linear -PCL ( T m = ∼55 °C; compressive modulus = ∼9.65 MPa) scaffolds have been produced from the corresponding acrylated macromers, yielding scaffolds with the ability to undergo press-fitting and shape recovery within a defect after exposure to temperatures above their melt transition ( T m ) . These bone-regenerative PCL scaffolds also possess biodegradability and pore interconnectivity (pore diameter ∼220 μm) to facilitate osteoinduction but do not possess any adhesive properties, which limits their usability for the treatment of confined bone defects. , Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images show that the 1-S2-FT01 resin penetrates 1 mm into the PCL scaffolds, causing physical interlocking of the PCL and resin and contributing to a strong adhesive bond (Figure A). PCL scaffolds adhered to the 1-S2-FT01 resin with maximum strengths in the MPa range (Figure B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already mentioned, the use of biomaterials for critical and load-bearing bone defects would indeed require an adequate mechanical strength able to mimic native tissue properties and sustain the newly forming bone without affecting its mechanical and functional performance, which is a difficult goal to achieve with polymeric materials. For this reason, despite the great advantage given by polymer biodegradability, the use of polymer-based porous scaffolds is often limited to the repair of noncritical bone defects, as in the craniomaxillofacial region [77][78][79]. The interaction of bone substitutes with biological fluids is another relevant parameter to be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%