Scientific Collaboration on the Internet 2008
DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262151207.003.0011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Scientific Collaboratory System: Investigating Utility before Deployment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this lacuna has since been addressed through numerous mixed‐methods case studies of data access and use in cyberinfrastructure (Baker & Bowker, 2007; Karasti, Baker, & Halkola, 2005; Ribes & Finholt, 2007; Sonnenwald, Whitton, & Maglaughlin, 2008), scholarly communication in research collections (Palmer, 2005), and institutional repositories (Davis & Connolly, 2007). Many of these studies have been qualitative in nature and have emphasized local practices that emerge and shape the design and use of these resource‐intensive infrastructures, often for the purpose of more effective design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this lacuna has since been addressed through numerous mixed‐methods case studies of data access and use in cyberinfrastructure (Baker & Bowker, 2007; Karasti, Baker, & Halkola, 2005; Ribes & Finholt, 2007; Sonnenwald, Whitton, & Maglaughlin, 2008), scholarly communication in research collections (Palmer, 2005), and institutional repositories (Davis & Connolly, 2007). Many of these studies have been qualitative in nature and have emphasized local practices that emerge and shape the design and use of these resource‐intensive infrastructures, often for the purpose of more effective design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%