2009
DOI: 10.1002/erv.968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a school‐based programme of universal eating disorders prevention: Is it more effective in girls at risk?

Abstract: There is currently controversy surrounding the effectiveness of universal versus selective prevention in eating disorders (ED). The present study aims at evaluating the effectiveness of universal school-based ED prevention administered to female secondary school students (n = 349). Students received either the full prevention programme (learning basic concepts of nutrition, criticism of aesthetic models of beauty emphasising extreme thinness, media literacy (ML)), a partial version of the programme (without nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using a quasi‐experimental design, 443 adolescents (254 girls and 189 boys) with a mean age of 13.5 years ( SD = 0.4) were assigned to one of three possible experimental conditions: media literacy (ML), media literacy plus nutrition awareness (ML+NUT) or a nontreatment control condition. The current study is based on a previous study involving 13 schools in the city of Terrassa, which were selected by stratified random sampling (Raich et al, ). Terrassa is the fifth largest city in number of inhabitants (200 000) in the autonomous community of Catalonia, one of the most important industrial cities in Spain and a renowned university centre.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By using a quasi‐experimental design, 443 adolescents (254 girls and 189 boys) with a mean age of 13.5 years ( SD = 0.4) were assigned to one of three possible experimental conditions: media literacy (ML), media literacy plus nutrition awareness (ML+NUT) or a nontreatment control condition. The current study is based on a previous study involving 13 schools in the city of Terrassa, which were selected by stratified random sampling (Raich et al, ). Terrassa is the fifth largest city in number of inhabitants (200 000) in the autonomous community of Catalonia, one of the most important industrial cities in Spain and a renowned university centre.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Spanish team developed an original prevention programme, and after preliminary studies (Raich et al, ; Raich, Portell, & Peláez‐Fernández, ), it was expanded and improved, giving it a more interactive format, increasing the number of sessions and incorporating new activism and media literacy activities. The intervention falls within the theoretical framework of the social cognitive model (Bandura, ) in terms of the reciprocal relationship between the environment and the individual.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopted a universal prevention program to avoid labeling the participating girls who were already suffering from (subclinical) eating disorders or showing specific risk factors. Other universal prevention programs were very effective (Becker et al, 2005;Raich et al, 2009) and primary prevention by definition includes this universal character. Furthermore, our cooperation partners insisted using teachers to implement the project rather than independent professionals on the theory that teachers would improve the program's sustainability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Media literacy interventions were found to be successful to combat the media’s glamorization of smoking (Primack et al 2009). Also, interventions were found to be successful in helping adolescents and young adults better process the images of models with “perfect” bodies and thus avoid developing eating disorders (Choma et al 2007; Evans et al 2006; Herzog and Eddy 2009; Levine and Murnen 2009; Nathanson and Botta 2003; Richardson et al 2009; Raich et al 2010; Ridolfi and Vander Wal 2008; Wilksch et al 2008; Wilksch and Wade, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%