2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a prototype field test for fracture and failure propagation propensity in weak snowpack layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
108
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
9
108
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While substantial progress has been made, application with regard to avalanche forecasting or hazard mapping is still hindered in part by our lack of understanding of the dynamic phase of crack propagation. For instance, based on practitioners' experience, it is not uncommon to perform PST field measurements with widespread crack propagation in 1 day, while a few days later, with seemingly very few changes in snowpack properties, cracks will no longer propagate (Gauthier and Jamieson, 2008). Thus far, there is no clear theoretical framework to interpret such observations, and it is not clear how and which snowpack properties affect dynamic crack propagation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While substantial progress has been made, application with regard to avalanche forecasting or hazard mapping is still hindered in part by our lack of understanding of the dynamic phase of crack propagation. For instance, based on practitioners' experience, it is not uncommon to perform PST field measurements with widespread crack propagation in 1 day, while a few days later, with seemingly very few changes in snowpack properties, cracks will no longer propagate (Gauthier and Jamieson, 2008). Thus far, there is no clear theoretical framework to interpret such observations, and it is not clear how and which snowpack properties affect dynamic crack propagation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sigrist and Schweizer (2007) were the first to estimate w f with field experiments and finite element (FE) modeling. Their method requires a Propagation Saw Test (PST;van Herwijnen and Jamieson, 2005;Sigrist and Schweizer, 2007;Gauthier and Jamieson, 2008) to determine the critical cut length r c and a snow micro-penetrometer measurement (SMP; Schneebeli and Johnson, 1998) to estimate the effective elastic modulus E of the slab. While Sigrist and Schweizer (2007) reported a mean fracture energy of 0.07 J m −2 , more recent results using the same methodology on eight different weak layers indicate substantially larger values, typically around 1 J m -2 (Schweizer and others, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hazen plotting positions were used to represent the nonexceedance probability as P = (i − 0.5)/68 where i is the rank of a datum. Data sources for the 750 tests include Gauthier [2007], Sigrist [2006], Gauthier and Jamieson [2008], and data from our group at the University of British Columbia [McClung, 2009a]. Approximately 90% of the measurements come from Gauthier [2007] and Gauthier and Jamieson [2008].…”
Section: Estimate Of Sweet Spot Lengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data sources for the 750 tests include Gauthier [2007], Sigrist [2006], Gauthier and Jamieson [2008], and data from our group at the University of British Columbia [McClung, 2009a]. Approximately 90% of the measurements come from Gauthier [2007] and Gauthier and Jamieson [2008]. For the 68 combinations, the mean and median lengths are: 0.64 m and 0.60 m. The most probable length from the mode of the gamma distribution is 0.53 m. The range is: 0.14 m to 1.3 m.…”
Section: Estimate Of Sweet Spot Lengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation