2017
DOI: 10.1097/qai.0000000000001286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Predictive Staging Model for HIV-Associated Kaposi Sarcoma in Uganda

Abstract: Background HIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is commonly staged using the AIDS Clinical Trials Group criteria, which classify 3 variables-- tumor extent (T), immune status (I), and systemic symptoms (S) – into good risk (0) and poor risk (1). Although validated in the US and Europe, these criteria have not been systematically evaluated in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where the burden of KS is greatest. Methods We reviewed medical charts of adult patients with HIV-associated KS seen at the Uganda Cancer Institu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
17
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously reported in the results, among patients with normal CD4 cell counts (> = 500/μl) at the time of initiating chemotherapy, the HR was 0.401(0.05,3.23), p value 0.391, which means the hazard of death was reduced by 60% but this was not statistically significant. A retrospective study conducted in Uganda to evaluate the validity of ACTG criteria in sub-Saharan Africa did not find baseline CD4 to be a predictor of survival in AIDS-KS patients whether in the short run or after 2 years [32]. The study reported a poor survival rate of 57% at 2 years and unexpectedly did not find cART to be a predictor of survival probably because of incomplete access to records or use of low potency anti-retroviral drugs in Uganda from 1992 to 2007 when the study participants were treated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously reported in the results, among patients with normal CD4 cell counts (> = 500/μl) at the time of initiating chemotherapy, the HR was 0.401(0.05,3.23), p value 0.391, which means the hazard of death was reduced by 60% but this was not statistically significant. A retrospective study conducted in Uganda to evaluate the validity of ACTG criteria in sub-Saharan Africa did not find baseline CD4 to be a predictor of survival in AIDS-KS patients whether in the short run or after 2 years [32]. The study reported a poor survival rate of 57% at 2 years and unexpectedly did not find cART to be a predictor of survival probably because of incomplete access to records or use of low potency anti-retroviral drugs in Uganda from 1992 to 2007 when the study participants were treated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em investigações realizadas em centros de referência em infectologia junto a pessoas vivendo com HIV, alguns fatores prognósticos de pior sobrevida já foram descritos, quais sejam: estadiamento avançado do tumor 5,6,17,18 , doenças sistêmicas concomitantes 5,6,17 , comprometimento pulmonar e hepático 19 , diagnóstico tardio do HIV 5 , contagem de células CD4 baixa (<200 células/mm 3 ) 18,19 e detecção sorológica do herpes-vírus humano tipo 8 ao diagnóstico 18 . Nessa investigação, idade ≥50 anos e sorologia anti-HIV positiva foram os únicos fatores independentes de pior prognóstico identificados.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Nessa investigação, idade ≥50 anos e sorologia anti-HIV positiva foram os únicos fatores independentes de pior prognóstico identificados. De modo controverso, outras pesquisas não identificaram a idade como um preditor da sobrevida do SK 5,6,[17][18][19] . Os resultados deste estudo são diferentes: diante do controle por diversas variáveis de confusão, inclusive sorologia anti-HIV, o efeito da idade ≥50 anos sobre o óbito foi evidenciado.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 Since the introduction of highly active ART in 1995, a number of significant changes in the treatment and epidemiology of KS have led to questions about whether ACTG staging is still optimal. 3,11 To address these limitations, in 2014 the WHO developed a modified staging system for KS specifically to guide treatment in resource limited settings, which is not yet in wide use, and has yet to be validated or compared to ACTG staging. 12 Ultimately, a cancer staging system should be both of prognostic value and guide therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%