2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthetic System During Walking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
106
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
106
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Joint kinematics at instance of minimum toe clearance, in degrees, presented as average ± standard deviation for level-only condition at selfselected velocity and as estimated marginal means ± standard error across both level and incline condition (at self-selected velocity). In general, the evidence supporting the use of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet for improving balance, function, and/or mobility of people with amputation is limited and has only recently begun to appear in the literature (e.g., references [25][26][27][28][29][30]). At present, there are few English-written studies of the ProprioFoot, and those that exist have focused on socket pressures [31], hip and knee kinematics and kinetics [32][33], gait economy [34][35], and related aspects of gait [36][37] but not on MTC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joint kinematics at instance of minimum toe clearance, in degrees, presented as average ± standard deviation for level-only condition at selfselected velocity and as estimated marginal means ± standard error across both level and incline condition (at self-selected velocity). In general, the evidence supporting the use of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet for improving balance, function, and/or mobility of people with amputation is limited and has only recently begun to appear in the literature (e.g., references [25][26][27][28][29][30]). At present, there are few English-written studies of the ProprioFoot, and those that exist have focused on socket pressures [31], hip and knee kinematics and kinetics [32][33], gait economy [34][35], and related aspects of gait [36][37] but not on MTC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several examples in which servicemembers who participated in intensive rehabilitation programs and had access to regular prosthetic care demonstrated smaller deficits than previously reported. For example, they have performed similarly to their nondisabled counterparts in areas such as activity performance, gait biomechanics, and walking stability [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. It is important to recognize that the similarities observed here and elsewhere, while encouraging, do not represent an absence of dysfunction or the full restoration of function in all people or across all aspects of life.…”
Section: Russell Esposito Et Al Metabolic Demand Of Walking In Amputeesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports of joint kinetics during the swing phase of walking have shown small differences (~20%) between the intact and amputated limbs (Ferris et al, 2012;Powers et al, 1998). This study has shown that when the inertial properties of the limb are adjusted using the GENERAL model, the differences between the INTACT and GENERAL methods is nearly 50% during swing phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%