2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Pathogen Detection in Septic Patients under Routine Condition: An Observational Study

Abstract: BackgroundTreatment of septic shock relies on appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Current culture based methods deliver final results after days, which may delay potentially lifesaving adjustments in antimicrobial therapy. This study was undertaken to compare PCR with blood culture results under routine conditions regarding 1. impact on antimicrobial therapy, and 2. time to result, in patients with presumed sepsis.Methodology/Principal FindingsThis was an observational study in a 50 beds ICU of a university hos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(49 reference statements)
4
74
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean time for species identification was 54.8 h by BACTEC CSF cultures whereas SF results were, in 94.8% of cases, obtained on the same day. These detection times are in line with a study from Bloos et al who compared SF with BC results from 245 patients with suspected sepsis and found that the median time for positive BC results was 68.8 h and, under optimal logistical conditions, 7.2 h for SF [17]. With the use of MALDI-TOF MS the time to identification could be reduced and in cases with clinically relevant pathogens combined with low TTP, the species identification might be possible in less than 24 h [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The mean time for species identification was 54.8 h by BACTEC CSF cultures whereas SF results were, in 94.8% of cases, obtained on the same day. These detection times are in line with a study from Bloos et al who compared SF with BC results from 245 patients with suspected sepsis and found that the median time for positive BC results was 68.8 h and, under optimal logistical conditions, 7.2 h for SF [17]. With the use of MALDI-TOF MS the time to identification could be reduced and in cases with clinically relevant pathogens combined with low TTP, the species identification might be possible in less than 24 h [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, these observations challenge recent data on clinical utility of the assay (50). To give a further example, Bloos and colleagues revealed a median time-to-positivity of 24.2 hours for their NAT and 68 hours for BC, also with a lab on-site (51). Depending on technician availability, the NAT median time-to-positivity increased up to 53.5 hours on weekends.…”
Section: Transport Vs Time-to-resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an observational study investigating implementation of multiplex PCR in the clinical routine of an ICU, an influence on treatment course was only observed when a pathogen was detected that was not susceptible to the initial calculated therapy-specifically, MDR (VRE and MRSA) bacteria and Candida species [94]. Only two randomized studies have been published on this topic so far: In one study comparing Aspergillus PCR to standard diagnostic testing in patients with fever and neutropenia, mortality could be significantly reduced by the PCR-directed treatment [95].…”
Section: New Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%