2018
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15051011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Pilot School-Based Physical Activity Clustered Randomised Controlled Trial—Active Schools: Skelmersdale

Abstract: Schools are key environments in which physical activity (PA) can be promoted. Various strategies and opportunities should be used to engage children in PA within schools. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the multi-component Active Schools: Skelmersdale (AS:Sk) pilot intervention on children’s PA and sedentary time (ST). The AS:Sk intervention was implemented for eight weeks in four schools with three control schools continuing normal practice. It consisted of eight components: active … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(99 reference statements)
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Children: Data were obtained from the baseline time-point of the Active Schools: Skelmersdale physical activity intervention (ASSK) pilot study (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03283904). As previously described (7), 232 children aged 9-10 y were recruited from seven primary schools situated in West Lancashire, UK. Ethical approval was granted by the University's Research Ethics Committee (reference # SPA-REC-2015-330) and informed consent and assent were provided by the participants' parents/carers, and the participants themselves, respectively.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children: Data were obtained from the baseline time-point of the Active Schools: Skelmersdale physical activity intervention (ASSK) pilot study (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03283904). As previously described (7), 232 children aged 9-10 y were recruited from seven primary schools situated in West Lancashire, UK. Ethical approval was granted by the University's Research Ethics Committee (reference # SPA-REC-2015-330) and informed consent and assent were provided by the participants' parents/carers, and the participants themselves, respectively.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase 1 was a cross-sectional observation study, 18 Phase 2 tested the feasibility of PA intervention components, 20 and Phase 3 was a pilot multicomponent PA intervention. 17 Data from Phases 1 and 3 (baseline only) were included in the present study. Data collection took place between October and December 2016 (Phase 1) and between September and October 2017 (Phase 3).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of different cutpoints can result in vastly different estimates of PA (5), which is confusing for interpretation and translation of data for surveillance and intervention evaluation. Most of the studies that have used raw accelerations to describe PA outcomes (6)(7)(8)(9) have employed the Euclidean norm minus one g (ENMO) metric to summarise the raw acceleration signal vector magnitude (10). They have also applied acceleration cutpoints from the laboratory calibration study of Hildebrand et al (2014) (2), which involved a convenience sample of 30, 7-11 year old children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%