Evaluation of a peer counselling programme to sustain breastfeeding practice in Hong Kong

Abstract

BackgroundPeer counselling is reported to increase breastfeeding rates. We evaluated an intervention consisting of mainly telephone contact peer counselling programme on breastfeeding duration and exclusivity.MethodsPeer counsellors (PCs) were mothers who had successfully breastfed and had received formal training. Following a postnatal visit, they provided scheduled telephone consultations (Days 1, 4, 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and Month 4) to PC group mothers (n = 100) who continued breastfeeding their infants after discharge. Control group mothers (n = 100) received routine care.ResultsAfter adjusting for mothers' previous breastfeeding experiences, mothers' working status and breastfeeding problems, no statistical differences in mothers' feeding methods (exclusive, almost exclusive or predominant breastfeeding) were noted at the three follow-up times for intervention and control mothers respectively (Day 5: 37%/38%, 46%/53%, 57%/63%; Month 3: 10%/9%, 17%/23%, 20%/26%; Month 6: 2%/1%, 18%/18%, 18%/19%). All differences between the groups were not significant. Also, there was no evidence to suggest that PC intervention prolonged breastfeeding duration.ConclusionThe lack of effect of our PC intervention may reflect the low baseline breastfeeding rate and low value placed on breastfeeding in our population, the type of PC intervention or group allocation biases.Trial registrationISRCTN93605280.

Interventions to improve breastfeeding outcomes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

“…Of these, after reviewing the abstracts of the 1042 articles that appeared relevant, we assessed 301 full text articles for eligibility and included 195 in our final database (Fig. ) . Of these, a total of 73 studies examined the effect of health systems and services on different breastfeeding outcomes, 57 stud...…”

Breastfeeding promotion interventions and breastfeeding practices: a systematic review

“…In Table 2 , we report the quality assessment of breastfeeding promotion intervention on predominant breast feeding. 13 studies had reported this outcome [ 11 , 12 , 18 , 20 , 36 , 42 , 46 , 52 , 58 , 61 , 72 , 76 , 85 ] and eight of these were conducted in developing countries. Overall, educational interventions had a non-significant effect on predominant breastfeeding rates at <1 month (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.43, 1.01) and at 1-5 months (RR: 1.08, 95%CI: 0.55, 2.13) (Figure 3 ), while there were no studies reporting predominant breastfeeding rates at day 1.…”

Callers’ attitudes and experiences of UK breastfeeding helpline support

“…This study found that the duration of exclusive (rather than ‘any’) breastfeeding was increased in the intervention group relative to a control group receiving standard care [20]. However, an evaluation of a breastfeeding peer support programme in Hong Kong, in which women received one postnatal visit and then support was provided entirely through telephone contacts thereafter, found no significant differences in breastfeeding duration or exclusivity [21]. An Australian study of telephone-based breastfeeding support provided by health professionals (lactation consultants) found higher rates of exclusive breastfeeding at 4.5 weeks in the intervention group in one setting (a private hospital) with no differences in the other setting (a public hospital) and no differences in breastfeeding rates in either setting at three months, despite high levels of user satisfaction [22].…”