Methods for the confirmation of nosocomial outbreaks of bacterial pathogens are complex, expensive, and time-consuming. Recently, a method based on ligation-mediated PCR (LM/PCR) using a low denaturation temperature which produces specific melting-profile patterns of DNA products has been described. Our objective was to further develop this method for real-time PCR and high-resolution melting analysis (HRM) in a single-tube system optimized in order to achieve results within 1 day. Following the optimization of LM/PCR for real-time PCR and HRM (LM/HRM), the method was applied for a nosocomial outbreak of extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and ST131-associated Escherichia coli isolates (n ؍ 15) and control isolates (n ؍ 29), including four previous clusters. The results from LM/HRM were compared to results from pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), which served as the gold standard. All isolates from the nosocomial outbreak clustered by LM/HRM, which was confirmed by gel electrophoresis of the LM/PCR products and PFGE. Control isolates that clustered by LM/PCR (n ؍ 4) but not by PFGE were resolved by confirmatory gel electrophoresis. We conclude that LM/HRM is a rapid method for the detection of nosocomial outbreaks of bacterial infections caused by ESBL-producing E. coli strains. It allows the analysis of isolates in a single-tube system within a day, and the discriminatory power is comparable to that of PFGE.Antibiotic resistance among bacteria is an increasing problem in hospitals and other health care facilities. In order to prevent nosocomial infections, basic hygiene procedures must be strictly followed by all staff members. When outbreaks occur, it is crucial to identify and isolate patients as soon as possible (5). In order to identify potential nosocomial outbreaks, several molecular methods have been described (2,14,20). These epidemiological typing methods are based on both genomic and phenotypic principles. Many of the methods are time-consuming and expensive and require special equipment. When designing new typing methods, several factors need to be considered, depending on the purpose. These factors include stability, discriminatory power, reproducibility, speed, accessibility, cost-efficiency, and user efficiency (2,19,20). In addition, its appropriateness in a given situation (e.g., an outbreak situation) must be evaluated. As of today, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is considered the gold standard for a large number of bacterial species because of its discriminatory power and high typeability (19,20). The drawbacks of PFGE are that it is laborious and time-consuming and that the interpretation can be complex and requires rigorous standardization and experienced personnel in order to achieve reproducible results that are comparable over time and place. Clear criteria to determine whether two or more isolates are identical during a restricted time and place have been developed (15,18). New genotyping methods are continuously being developed. One approach is repetiti...