2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79415-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a panel of spermatological methods for assessing reprotoxic compounds in multilayer semen plastic bags

Abstract: The increase of fertility performance in sows is one of the biggest achievements in pig production over the last 30 years. Nevertheless, pig farms using artificial insemination (AI) repeatedly experienced in recent year’s fertility problems with dramatic consequences due to toxic compounds from plastic semen bags. In particular, bisphenol A diglycidyl-ether (BADGE) present in multilayer plastic bags can leach into the semen and could affect the functionality of the spermatozoa. Former studies could not find an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess sperm quality, we chose sensitive methods, which are well correlated with actual boar fertility (Schulze et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To assess sperm quality, we chose sensitive methods, which are well correlated with actual boar fertility (Schulze et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of plasma membrane and acrosome intact sperm was done by triple staining with fluorescein isothiocyanateconjugated peanut agglutinin (FITC-PNA), pisum sativum agglutinin (FITC-PSA) and PI (Schäfer et al, 2017). Sperm plasma membrane lipid organization and viability were simultaneously assessed by double staining with Merocyanine 540 (M540) and YoPro-1 as described previously (Schulze et al, 2020).…”
Section: Flow Cytometric Assessment Of Spermatozoamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, by using Eqs. (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32), the potential energy of a three-layered hyperelastic beam can be rewritten, which is not presented here for the sake of brevity. It should be mentioned that for having more layers in the laminated hyperelastic beam model, Eqs.…”
Section: Layered Hyperelastic Shear Deformable Beam Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be mentioned that for having more layers in the laminated hyperelastic beam model, Eqs. (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32) should be rewritten on the right side, based on the number of layers. The kinetic energy of the structure is written as…”
Section: Layered Hyperelastic Shear Deformable Beam Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation