2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a novel immunochromatographic device for rapid and accurate clinical detection of Porphyromonas gingivalis in subgingival plaque

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results reaffirm that DK13‐PG‐001 could identify clinically relevant levels of Pg , and the device score demonstrates a high correlation with number of Pg by the PCR‐invader method. In a previous study, not only patients with periodontitis but also healthy individuals were included to evaluate the device for detection of Pg in subgingival plaque: a positive correlation between DK13‐PG‐001 and PCR‐invader ( r = 0.743) was presented 22 . In this study, the correlation coefficient ( r = 0.862) between DK13‐PG‐001 and PCR‐invader was higher than in the previous study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These results reaffirm that DK13‐PG‐001 could identify clinically relevant levels of Pg , and the device score demonstrates a high correlation with number of Pg by the PCR‐invader method. In a previous study, not only patients with periodontitis but also healthy individuals were included to evaluate the device for detection of Pg in subgingival plaque: a positive correlation between DK13‐PG‐001 and PCR‐invader ( r = 0.743) was presented 22 . In this study, the correlation coefficient ( r = 0.862) between DK13‐PG‐001 and PCR‐invader was higher than in the previous study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…They were immediately transferred into a sampling tube supplied in the test device kit. It was confirmed that contamination of sampling paper points with blood had no significant influence on detection results 22 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations