2010
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20100429-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Noninvasive Expandable Prosthesis in Musculoskeletal Oncology Patients for the Upper and Lower Limb

Abstract: The noninvasive expandable prosthesis is used for limb-salvage surgery following tumor resection in skeletally immature patients. The purpose of this retrospective study is to report our experience with the Repiphysis (Wright Medical Technology, Inc; Arlington, Tennessee) noninvasive expandable prosthesis for both the lower extremity and compassionate use in the upper extremity in 12 patients between 2003 and 2008. Twelve prostheses were implanted in 12 patients with an average follow-up of 38 months (range, 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
13
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
13
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the most frequent reason for revision was prosthetic failure attributable to spring breakage (eight cases). Younger patient age and longer followup in our current series compared with previous studies [2,11,17,22] might have influenced the results. Longer followup obviously exposes the implant to more risks of failure.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the most frequent reason for revision was prosthetic failure attributable to spring breakage (eight cases). Younger patient age and longer followup in our current series compared with previous studies [2,11,17,22] might have influenced the results. Longer followup obviously exposes the implant to more risks of failure.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Patient age could partially explain the difficulties in pain management with our patients. Our patients were younger, with a mean age of 8 years at index surgery, whereas in other series the patients were older than 10 years [2,4,11,18,22]. Furthermore, the amount of lengthening was unpredictable and difficult to control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations