2013
DOI: 10.5665/sleep.2450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Noninvasive Algorithm for Differentiation of Obstructive and Central Hypopneas

Abstract: Randerath WJ; Treml M; Priegnitz C; Stieglitz S; Hagmeyer L; Morgenstern C. Evaluation of a noninvasive algorithm for differentiation of obstructive and central hypopneas. SLEEP 2013;36(3):363-368.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
58
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…If quality was not acceptable, specific training was provided, followed by another quality assessment. A key element of the PSG scoring was the differentiation of apneas and hypopneas as central or obstructive using flattening of the inspiratory airflow curve, paradoxical breathing, arousal position, sleep stages, and breathing pattern at the end of the hypopnea 25, 26…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If quality was not acceptable, specific training was provided, followed by another quality assessment. A key element of the PSG scoring was the differentiation of apneas and hypopneas as central or obstructive using flattening of the inspiratory airflow curve, paradoxical breathing, arousal position, sleep stages, and breathing pattern at the end of the hypopnea 25, 26…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just 1 or 2 obstructed breaths at the end of an apnea did not change the classification to a central event. Obstructive versus central hypopneas were determined based on the presence/absence of inspiratory flow limitation and/or paradoxical abdominal/thoracic movements on respiratory inductance plethysmography if available 25, 26…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technology utilized in our study (intercostal EMG and impedance plethysmography) has a limited capacity to distinguish between obstructive and central hypopneas, and it is possible that some hypopneas may have been of central origin. An algorithm to assist in distinguishing central from obstructive hypopneas has been reported, 13 and this may be of use in future studies. The fact that all had significant obstructive apnea and those with central apnea were excluded should mitigate this possibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the implementation of additional criteria, such as flattening, snoring, paradoxical effort movements, arousal position relative to hypopnoeas and associated sleep stage (REM/non-REM), to distinguish between obstructive and central respiratory events [22], some misclassification may have biased the results with respect to the type of sleep apnoea.…”
Section: Sleep-related Disorders S Buchner Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, hypopnoeas were classified as obstructive if there was out-of-phase motion of the ribcage and abdomen, or if airflow limitation was present. In order to achieve optimal distinction between obstructive and central hypopnoeas without using an oesophageal balloon, we used additional criteria, such as flattening, snoring, paradoxical effort movements, arousal position relative to hypopnoeas and associated sleep stage (rapid eye movement (REM)/non-REM) [22]. CSA was defined as .50% central apnoeas and hypopnoeas of all apnoeas and hypopnoeas.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%