Evaluation of a non‐metallic dual‐port expander for intensity modulated proton therapy

Abstract

PurposeTo provide a methodology for characterization of the technical properties of a newly developed non‐metallic tissue expander for intensity modulated proton therapy.MethodsThree tissue expanders (AlloX2‐Pro: plastic‐dual port, AlloX2: metal‐dual port, and Dermaspan: metal‐single port) were deconstructed, CT‐scanned, and modeled in RayStation12A. A 165 MeV single spot was used to create RayStation dose planes, and the integrated depth dose profiles were calculated and the DR90 extracted to predict water equivalent thickness (WET). These predictions were compared to measurements taken with an IBA Giraffe MLIC. Native, water, and fully modelled overrides were compared for the AlloX2 Pro to quantify differences in override choices. Geometric considerations between expanders were compared using a ray‐tracing technique to contour the “no‐fly” zone around metallic components using a clinical, three beam arrangement. Lastly, a planning and evaluation framework was provided using a single plan as an illustration.ResultsThe measured AlloX2‐Pro WET values were within 0.22 cm of RayStation predictions while metallic values ranged from 0.08 to 0.46 cm. Using natively scanned density values for the AlloX2 Pro improved the discrepancy in WET between predicted and measured from −0.22 to −0.09 cm (drain) and from −0.17 to −0.12 cm (injection). The “no‐fly” zone volume of all three beams reduced 95% between the AlloX2‐Pro and Dermaspan, which geometrically allowed more uniform coverage behind the port and reduced need for beam modulation.ConclusionThe beam perturbation of the AlloX2‐Pro is well modeled, but improved agreement with measured WET values was observed when utilizing native densities in calculations. The AlloX2 Pro can support beam arrangements that traverse the ports, which can enable simpler beam geometry and a reduction in dose modulation around the port to promote improved robustness and treatment delivery quality.