2011
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.72.4.433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a nine-point body condition scoring system in physically inactive pet cats

Abstract: The 9-point BCS scale appears useful for assessing %BF in DSH pet cats. Nevertheless, study findings could indicate a need for redefining the ideal BCS for inactive neutered cats to include a BCS of 4.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
107
2
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(30 reference statements)
3
107
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The most commonly used systems are the 5-point and 9-point scales, with the use of one over the other in clinical practice being based on personal preference (Laflamme 1997;Thatcher et al 2000;Zoran 2009). Body fat percentage estimated using the 9-point BCS scale is repeatable and correlates well with body fat measured by DEXA (Laflamme 1997;German et al 2006;Bjornvad et al 2011;Borges et al 2012). BCS systems do not provide an assessment of muscle mass, and so muscle catabolism may not be recognised if muscle mass is not also assessed (Baldwin et al 2010;Michel et al 2011).…”
Section: Body Condition and Muscle Mass Scoring Systemsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most commonly used systems are the 5-point and 9-point scales, with the use of one over the other in clinical practice being based on personal preference (Laflamme 1997;Thatcher et al 2000;Zoran 2009). Body fat percentage estimated using the 9-point BCS scale is repeatable and correlates well with body fat measured by DEXA (Laflamme 1997;German et al 2006;Bjornvad et al 2011;Borges et al 2012). BCS systems do not provide an assessment of muscle mass, and so muscle catabolism may not be recognised if muscle mass is not also assessed (Baldwin et al 2010;Michel et al 2011).…”
Section: Body Condition and Muscle Mass Scoring Systemsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, DEXA assumes the hydration of the fat-free mass is constant and so accuracy can be affected by the level of muscle hydration (Speakman et al 2001;Jeusette et al 2010). This method has several disadvantages such as the exposure to radiation, the need for sedation, the cost, and the technical expertise required, which limits its use to the research setting (German 2010;Bjornvad et al 2011).…”
Section: Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canine and feline specimens were collected as biopsy samples during surgical interventions performed at veterinary clinics by isolating adipose tissue from the falciform ligament and the greater omentum, respectively. The body condition score (BCS) was used to cluster the feline (Bjornvad et al 2011) and the canine (Müller et al 2014) samples into normal and obese categories. Three cats and five dogs were normal (BCS5 for cats, BCS3 for dogs); three cats and four dogs were obese (BCS7 for cats and BCS5 for dogs).…”
Section: Animals and Tissue Harvestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A avaliação do ECC é realizada pelas características visuais e de palpação do animal e, apesar de ser considerado um método subjetivo (BURKHOLDER; TOLL, 2000), apresenta uma boa correlação com o percentual de gordura obtido pela técnica de absorciometria de raios-x de dupla energia (DEXA) (MAWBY et al, 2004, BJORNVAD et al, 2011. Dessa forma, o ECC foi utilizado como método diagnóstico de sobrepeso e obesidade nos felinos deste estudo.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified