1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8227(88)80020-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a new system for self blood glucose monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one is inconvenience and the required compliance by patients, while the second is that this is not a continuous monitoring method. Despite intensive efforts [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], no method is currently available for the continuous non-invasive monitoring of blood glucose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is inconvenience and the required compliance by patients, while the second is that this is not a continuous monitoring method. Despite intensive efforts [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], no method is currently available for the continuous non-invasive monitoring of blood glucose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noninvasive measurements of blood glucose have been a long-standing research goal. To date, a wide variety of methods have been described in the literature, including near-infrared spectroscopy (3)(4)(5), optical rotation (6, 7), amperometric (8,9), colorimetric (10,11), and fluorescence detection (12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Despite some promising results, these methods show limitations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To add this error, an approximate model was created using the data available. Specifically, 78% of the measurements are within 20% of the actual value, defining the A range on the Clarke Error Grid [25], and the correlation between actual and the approximated blood glucose values is around 0.88 [11]. In addition, maximum errors in the literature are no greater than 40% based on observation of the results presented.…”
Section: B Modeling Noise For the Cgms Sensormentioning
confidence: 77%