The ability to reliably and reproducibly sample surfaces contaminated with a biological agent is a critical step in measuring the extent of contamination and determining if decontamination steps have been successful. The recovery operations following the 2001 attacks with Bacillus anthracis spores were complicated by the fact that no standard sample collection format or decontamination procedures were established. Recovery efficiencies traditionally have been calculated based upon biological agents which were applied to test surfaces in a liquid format and then allowed to dry prior to sampling tests, which may not be best suited for a real-world event with aerosolized biological agents. In order to ascertain if differences existed between air-dried liquid deposition and biological spores which were allowed to settle on a surface in a dried format, a study was undertaken to determine if differences existed in surface sampling recovery efficiencies for four representative surfaces. Studies were then undertaken to compare sampling efficiencies between liquid spore deposition and aerosolized spores which were allowed to gradually settle under gravity on four different test coupon types. Tests with both types of deposition compared efficiencies of four unique swabbing materials applied to four surfaces with various surface properties. Our studies demonstrate that recovery of liquid-deposited spores differs significantly from recovery of dry aerosol-deposited spores in most instances. Whether the recovery of liquid-deposited spores is overexaggerated or underrepresented with respect to that of aerosol-deposited spores depends upon the surface material being tested.Since 2001, the biological defense community has made great strides in improving our readiness to respond to and recover from an attack with a biological pathogen. Lessons learned in restoring operations within large building complexes contaminated with Bacillus anthracis spores or ricin toxin have led to the development of more-efficient tools for the detection of biological pathogens and means of decontaminating affected facilities. A key step in determining the extent of contamination during the initial stages of a bioterrorist attack and in ascertaining if a building can be reoccupied in the final stages of cleanup is our ability to effectively sample an area and deliver a specimen for testing.Currently there are several commercially available sampling products (2,3,8,9,16,23), but test data demonstrate that they are limited in their ability to detect and recover biological samples, with estimated recovery efficiencies ranging from approximately 10% to 40% (8,11,19). Studies have also shown that a significant proportion of the biological agent that can be sampled from a solid surface remains adhered to the sampling materials despite efforts to wash it off for testing or is lost during the sample processing (1,7,19).Historically, recovery efficiencies of swabs found in sampling kits have been calculated based on their ability to recover a liquid bacterial...