2007
DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mem030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a National Register on Occupational Exposure to Carcinogens: Effectiveness in the Prevention of Occupational Cancer, and Cancer Risks among the Exposed Workers

Abstract: These results suggest that a national exposure register may stimulate preventive measures at workplaces. Partially based on the results of the present study the Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health continues ASA registration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example of this is the mandatory Finnish ASA registry* which collects information on carcinogen use (both type and amount) in Finnish workplaces. 19,20 Kauppinen et al (2007) undertook an evaluation of the ASA registry by focussing on workplaces that had ceased reporting, to determine whether carcinogens were no longer in use, or whether the cessation of reporting was in error. 21 Making the exposure registry reporting available to front-line inspectors provides a mechanism for reminding workplaces about the need to report (where mandatory) or the benefits of reporting (where voluntary).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An example of this is the mandatory Finnish ASA registry* which collects information on carcinogen use (both type and amount) in Finnish workplaces. 19,20 Kauppinen et al (2007) undertook an evaluation of the ASA registry by focussing on workplaces that had ceased reporting, to determine whether carcinogens were no longer in use, or whether the cessation of reporting was in error. 21 Making the exposure registry reporting available to front-line inspectors provides a mechanism for reminding workplaces about the need to report (where mandatory) or the benefits of reporting (where voluntary).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 Kauppinen et al (2007) undertook an evaluation of the ASA registry by focussing on workplaces that had ceased reporting, to determine whether carcinogens were no longer in use, or whether the cessation of reporting was in error. 21 Making the exposure registry reporting available to front-line inspectors provides a mechanism for reminding workplaces about the need to report (where mandatory) or the benefits of reporting (where voluntary). Linkages with regulatory bodies that collect exposure measurement can also provide the opportunity for evaluating whether a registry has any effect on exposure prevalence or exposure levels in workplaces, or industries more broadly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%