Evaluation of a Motivational Smoking Cessation Intervention for Women in Public Health Clinics

Manfredi, Clara; Crittenden, Kathleen S.; Warnecke, Richard B.; Engler, Julie; Cho, Young I.; Shaligram, Chitra

doi:10.1006/pmed.1998.0377

Cited by 57 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…27 The 10 clinics with all of the 3 earlier-mentioned services were included in this analysis. Six clinics were part of a health department, 2 were neighborhood health centers, and 2 were attached to universities.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Minimal smoking cessation interventions in prenatal, family planning, and well-child public health clinics

et al. 2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives. This study assessed the prevalence and effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for women of childbearing age in public health clinics.Methods. Smokers in prenatal, family planning, and well-child services in 10 public health clinics (n = 1021) were interviewed 5 to 8 weeks after a medical visit to assess their exposure to smoking cessation interventions and smoking cessation outcomes.Results. Depending on clinic service and intervention component (poster, video segment, provider advice, booklet), 16% to 63% of women reported exposure to an intervention component during their visit. Women in prenatal services received more interventions and had better outcomes than those in the other services.Conclusions. Exposure to more interventions increased readiness and motivation to quit and the number of actions taken toward quitting. (Am J

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Minimal smoking cessation interventions in prenatal, family planning, and well-child public health clinics

et al. 2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Both the baseline and control groups reflected usual and customary conditions in the clinics. The baseline and control groups were similar in pre-and postvisit study outcomes 1 and in reported exposure to intervention components (data not shown). Therefore, we combined cases from the baseline and the experimental control groups, for a total of 1042 control cases.…”

Section: Case Accrual and Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 84%

“…1 Patients in the study and those lost to attrition did not differ by race, cigarettes smoked per day, stage of readiness, motivation, or confidence. In the experimental intervention panel only, attrition varied by service, with greater attrition in prenatal services and less attrition in wellchild services.…”

Section: Case Accrual and Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 86%

“…1 Our previous analysis showed substantial exposure to 4 basic intervention components (provider advice, booklet, posters, a video) in the study control group, with large variation in exposure across clinic services. 35 Smoking outcomes among control subjects were a positive function of level of exposure to these basic intervention components.…”

mentioning

confidence: 87%

“…In this report we discuss findings from the evaluation of a smoking cessation program offered in public health clinics 1 in light of the varied degree of implementation of existing interventions in the control group. This issue is important because the study was conducted in a public health practice context (i.e., where both experimental and usual and customary interventions were to be initiated and delivered to patients by clinic personnel as part of routine medical visits).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The effect of a structured smoking cessation program, independent of exposure to existing interventions

et al. 2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the effectiveness of a smoking cessation program for women in public health clinics, controlling for reported exposures to 4 common intervention components (provider advice, booklet, video segment, posters) among smokers in the control group. METHODS: After a baseline control period, 10 pair-matched clinics were randomly assigned to study groups. A total of 1042 smokers in the combined baseline and control groups and 454 smokers in the intervention group completed a preintervention questionnaire and a postintervention telephone interview 5 to 8 weeks later. Eight smoking outcomes, including quitting, were analyzed for the effect of reported exposure to intervention components, experimental program, and clinic service. RESULTS: Greater exposure to intervention components, being in the experimental program, and being seen in prenatal clinics independently improved smoking outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The number of interventions reported by smokers in the control group ranged from none to 4 and varied across clinic services. The experimental program we tested produced better outcomes than the minimal smoking cessation interventions already existing in the control clinics, after we controlled for whether smokers were or were not exposed to these interventions.

show abstract

Physician advice for smoking cessation

Lancaster

Stead

2004

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

274

199

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of a Motivational Smoking Cessation Intervention for Women in Public Health Clinics

Cited by 57 publications

References 21 publications

Minimal smoking cessation interventions in prenatal, family planning, and well-child public health clinics

Minimal smoking cessation interventions in prenatal, family planning, and well-child public health clinics

The effect of a structured smoking cessation program, independent of exposure to existing interventions

Physician advice for smoking cessation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About