2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10450-011-9324-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a mixed geometry model for the characterization of activated carbons

Abstract: The predictions of the Pure Slit Geometry Model (PSGM) and the Mixed Geometry Model (MGM) for the characterization of activated carbons (AC) are compared and tested against the behavior of the textural properties of series of AC obtained from coconut shells by varying the concentration of the chemical activation agent over a wide range. Through the analysis of results it is concluded that the MGM can be regarded as reliable as the PSGM, with an apparently more consistent description of the behavior as a functi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, Prasad et al 1999 show experimental differential adsorption enthalpies values of the order of 6 kcal/mol for a very ''pure'' AC (phosphorous and sulfur contents less than 0.005 %) obtained by physical activation, providing evidence of interactions of adsorbate molecules with more than two graphitic walls. These facts support the Mixed Geometry Model (MGM), proposed and tested in the last few years (Azevedo et al 2010;Soares Maia et al 2010;Toso et al 2011), which assumes that the AC porous network is better represented by a mixture of infinitely long slit geometry pores and triangular geometry pores of different sizes. The model isotherm of MGM is given by the following expression.…”
Section: Pore Geometrysupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, Prasad et al 1999 show experimental differential adsorption enthalpies values of the order of 6 kcal/mol for a very ''pure'' AC (phosphorous and sulfur contents less than 0.005 %) obtained by physical activation, providing evidence of interactions of adsorbate molecules with more than two graphitic walls. These facts support the Mixed Geometry Model (MGM), proposed and tested in the last few years (Azevedo et al 2010;Soares Maia et al 2010;Toso et al 2011), which assumes that the AC porous network is better represented by a mixture of infinitely long slit geometry pores and triangular geometry pores of different sizes. The model isotherm of MGM is given by the following expression.…”
Section: Pore Geometrysupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Finally, there is an interesting finding for N 2 @ 77 K adsorption using the MGM. Figure 6 shows differential and cumulative PSDs for AC samples obtained from coconut shells by chemical activation (Toso et al 2011). The MGM and SGM N 2 isotherm fits, not shown here, are very similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The PSDs predicted by the adsorption of N 2 and CO 2 in the ultramicropore region were in good agreement for all the samples (considering that the N 2 PSD was biased due to the 1 nm pore-size gap due to the absence of heterogeneity), a behaviour that is not always observed (Débora et al 2010(Débora et al , 2011de Oliveira et al 2011;Toso et al 2010).…”
Section: Figure 2 Presents a Comparison Between The Experimental Isotmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Although there is experimental evidence suggesting that the carbon pores have a slitlike geometry, several works [9][10][11][12][13] suggest that the use of triangular-shaped pores introduces an energetic heterogeneity due to the pore shape, which might produce better agreement to experimental measurements of the isosteric heat of adsorption obtained using slit pores as a model. The mixed model is not better than existing models that consider heterogeneity, such as QSDFT or the Two-Dimensional NLDFT model [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%