2015
DOI: 10.2749/222137815818357854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a minimum flexural reinforcement ratio using fracture-based modelling

Abstract: Minimum reinforcement ratios are specified for reinforced concrete structures to provide enough ductility. The aims are to control cracking in the serviceability limit state and to prevent sudden failure by ensuring sufficient ductility after the loss of tensile stress in concrete due to cracking. This can provide a warning before collapse and time to take preventive or remedial measures. A review of past research reveals that there are large variations, and sometimes contradictions, in proposed minimum reinfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Minimum reinforcement has been studied in many publications. Some of these publications, however, are focused only on robustness reinforcement to avoid brittle failure from a very practical code‐type formulation, or on how robustness reinforcement can be optimized by consideration of fracture mechanics, and its implications on the size effect, and are mostly centered on bending without axial force . Others are focused on minimum reinforcement required for control of cracking, but these either address cases of pure bending or pure axial forces but not the combination of both or deal only with cracking from imposed strains …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimum reinforcement has been studied in many publications. Some of these publications, however, are focused only on robustness reinforcement to avoid brittle failure from a very practical code‐type formulation, or on how robustness reinforcement can be optimized by consideration of fracture mechanics, and its implications on the size effect, and are mostly centered on bending without axial force . Others are focused on minimum reinforcement required for control of cracking, but these either address cases of pure bending or pure axial forces but not the combination of both or deal only with cracking from imposed strains …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…gives more ductile behaviour when compared with beams with lower reinforcement ratios (Fayyad and Lees 2015). However, this increase in the ductility was not sufficient to ensure a final ductile failure and the beam failed due to a sudden reinforcement fracture.…”
Section: Model Outcomementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Fracture processes are particularly important for lightly reinforced concrete beams where the crack propagation and concrete tensile softening have a strong influence on the behaviour. An understanding of these phenomena will also inform a more fundamental definition of the minimum reinforcement requirements for reinforced concrete beams (Fayyad and Lees 2015…”
Section: Research Significance and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the failure of a hybrid GFRP/steel RC beam is controlled by the yielding of steel and rupturing of FRP, then a minimum amount of hybrid GFRP/steel reinforcement should be provided to prevent failure upon concrete cracking [24][25][26][27][28]:…”
Section: Minimum Hybrid Gfrp/steel Reinforcement Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some approaches to develop formulas for determining the limiting reinforcement ratios for RC beams. The most popular methods are the fracture mechanics method and equilibrium equations method, which equate the cracking moment M cr to the flexural strength M u [24][25]. The latter method is used in existing standards and design codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%