2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-004-1249-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a latex agglutination test (KAtex) for detection of Leishmania antigen in urine of patients with HIV-Leishmania coinfection: value in diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up

Abstract: The usefulness of antigen detection in urine as an alternative tool for diagnosis of leishmaniasis and post-treatment follow-up in patients with Leishmania-HIV coinfection was evaluated with a latex agglutination test (KAtex; Kalon Biological, UK). Forty-nine HIV-infected patients with visceral leishmaniasis were included in the study. Antigen detection in urine (ADU) was positive in 42 of 49 (sensitivity, 85.7%) samples obtained during a primary episode. After treatment, a follow-up study in 23 patients was p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
56
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other biologic assays have been proposed for diagnosis of relapses; however, qualitative analysis of specific antibodies is dependent on the sensitivity of immunoblotting and the immune status of the host, and antigen detection in urine during patient follow-up is not correlated with clinical symptoms. 24,25 In conclusion, quantification of L. infantum DNA in blood samples showed a dispersion of the results over 9 log values and determined a threshold between asymptomatic carriage and the acute phase of the disease. Sampling blood rather than bone marrow for initial diagnosis of the disease constitutes an additional advantage and a better approach for analyzing asymptomatic carriage of Leishmania in epidemiologic and genetic studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Other biologic assays have been proposed for diagnosis of relapses; however, qualitative analysis of specific antibodies is dependent on the sensitivity of immunoblotting and the immune status of the host, and antigen detection in urine during patient follow-up is not correlated with clinical symptoms. 24,25 In conclusion, quantification of L. infantum DNA in blood samples showed a dispersion of the results over 9 log values and determined a threshold between asymptomatic carriage and the acute phase of the disease. Sampling blood rather than bone marrow for initial diagnosis of the disease constitutes an additional advantage and a better approach for analyzing asymptomatic carriage of Leishmania in epidemiologic and genetic studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, it has been reported that antigenuria becomes negative after successful chemotherapy, suggesting that KAtex may be a useful tool for monitoring the efficacy of the treatment 2 . In another two studies of co-infected patients in Spain, KAtex had a sensitivity of 85.7% and 100%, respectively, when the parasite load was high 27,34 . ATTAR et al, 5 reported the potential use of this test to diagnose active infection, although the need still exists for additional studies in order to provide a better definition of the role of KAtex, both in investigating the infection and during post-therapy follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The present report of the use of KAtex in co-infected patients is the first publication on the Brazilian population. Whether the test is applicable to detecting asymptomatic or subclinical populations has still not been sufficiently clarified 5,13,27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have demonstrated Leishmania antigens in the urine of VL patients and animals using different techniques including double countercurrent immunoelectrophoresis (22), ELISA (3,20,36), and Western blotting (13). Recently, a latex agglutination test (KAtex kit) to detect Leishmania antigen in urine showed 100% specificity and 47 to 100% sensitivity in different studies with immunocompetent patients (2,32) and 96 to 100% specificity and 85 to 100% sensitivity in immunodepressed patients (31,37).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%