2019
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2019.2930493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Large Scale Event Driven Robot Skin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few recent research papers have demonstrated e-skin applications with event-based signaling and encoding using different implementations. [29,[175][176][177][178] For example, to address these challenges, Lee et al reported an asynchronously coded electronic skin (ACES)-a neuromimetic architecture that enables the simultaneous transmission of real-time tactile information with exceptionally low readout latencies, even with array sizes beyond 10 000 sensors (Figure 12c). [29] The prototype ACES system encodes signals by generating a signature signal for each sensor via a tiny microcontroller connected to each sensor and transmits the signals from all sensors through only one single wire.…”
Section: Event-based Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few recent research papers have demonstrated e-skin applications with event-based signaling and encoding using different implementations. [29,[175][176][177][178] For example, to address these challenges, Lee et al reported an asynchronously coded electronic skin (ACES)-a neuromimetic architecture that enables the simultaneous transmission of real-time tactile information with exceptionally low readout latencies, even with array sizes beyond 10 000 sensors (Figure 12c). [29] The prototype ACES system encodes signals by generating a signature signal for each sensor via a tiny microcontroller connected to each sensor and transmits the signals from all sensors through only one single wire.…”
Section: Event-based Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long distance connections and high bandwidths increase the influences of noise, crosstalk, reflection, and distortion resulting in the loss of signals, and failures in the power distribution, that is, signal and power integrity are harder to maintain when distance and bandwidth increase. Consequently, realizing low-latency connections between the distributed tactile sensors and handling a large amount of tactile information (e.g., 1260 skin cells @ 250 Hz, clock-driven: 315,000 packets/s, 29 MB/s) [40] are both demanding challenges in LASSs.…”
Section: Low-latency (C-5) and Efficiency (C-6)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our initial works [38][39][40] demonstrated the effectiveness of the event-driven approach for handling the large amount of tactile information of LASSs in various experimental setups. Now, this work intends to provide a solid foundation for realizing and understanding event-driven LASSs in general with an emphasis on three points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is then passed to the motion execution stage, during which the planned joint trajectories are tracked as accurately as possible (Siciliano et al, 2009). For physical human-robot interaction (pHRI), these controllers rely on the prediction of robot collisions with the environment (Bergner et al, 2019;Lee and Song, 2015;Phan et al, 2011). As the reference trajectory cannot be modified during motion, the robot executes a stop reaction if a safety-related signal exceeds a pre-defined threshold (e.g., the distance between robot and environment is too small or the collision force with the environment is too large).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%