2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a hybrid system for three-dimensional measurement of trunk posture in motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
64
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have shown the validity of the IMC system for measurement of kinematics (Cutti et al, 2008;Faber et al, 2013b;Godwin et al, 2009;Luinge and Veltink, 2005;Plamondon et al, 2007;Roetenberg et al, 2005). However, the number of studies testing the validity of the system for the assessment of the kinetics (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have shown the validity of the IMC system for measurement of kinematics (Cutti et al, 2008;Faber et al, 2013b;Godwin et al, 2009;Luinge and Veltink, 2005;Plamondon et al, 2007;Roetenberg et al, 2005). However, the number of studies testing the validity of the system for the assessment of the kinetics (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inertial sensor-based systems have also been proposed for movement recording (Mayagoitia, Nene, & Veltink, 2002;Picerno, Cereatti, & Cappozzo, 2008;Plamondon et al, 2007;Zhou, Hu, Harris, & Hammerton, 2006;Zhou, Stone, Hu, & Harris, 2008). These have the advantage of being wearable, freeing the subject from the constraints of executing movements within a defined volume, as is the case with the systems mentioned previously (i.e., markers in magnetic or optical systems are wearable, but the acquisition system is not, which requires that the subject constrain his movements to the volume covered by the acquisition equipment).…”
Section: Movement Acquisition Devices For Human Motion Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to efforts to improve methods for measuring exposure in self-reported surveys (Stock et al, 2005b), members of the MSD axis have worked on developing methods to collect individual-level measures of biomechanical work exposure (Delisle et al, 2005(Delisle et al, , 2009Laperrière et al, 2006;Plamondon et al, 2007). Since continuous recording generates enormous amounts of data, researchers are exploring methods to select the exposure measures most relevant to the risk under study.…”
Section: Wmsd Exposure Measurement and Underlying Physiological Mechamentioning
confidence: 99%