1978
DOI: 10.1016/0047-0740(78)90169-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a high resolution ring detector positron camera system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wobble mode required the center of the tomograph to be moved to four specific locations around the circumference of a circle 1 in. in diameter, a design developed by Eriksson 31 at the Karolinska Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. A complete emission data set was acquired at each wobble position, thereby sampling different lines of response throughout the field-of-view.…”
Section: Instrumentation For Tomographic Imaging Of Positron Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wobble mode required the center of the tomograph to be moved to four specific locations around the circumference of a circle 1 in. in diameter, a design developed by Eriksson 31 at the Karolinska Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. A complete emission data set was acquired at each wobble position, thereby sampling different lines of response throughout the field-of-view.…”
Section: Instrumentation For Tomographic Imaging Of Positron Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…119 Historically, the only PET scanners developed specifically for cardiology appeared around the mid-1980s, the POSICAM scanner from Positron Corporation 120 in 1985 that used barium fluoride crystals and the ECAT III, 32 which had a similar, three detector rings with five image planes arrangement as in the earlier NEUROECAT. 31 The subsequent block design, whole-body scanners met the needs of cardiology. Prior to the introduction of the LSO scintillator, 3-D PET scanning of the heart using BGO scintillators was challenging due to the high out-of-field photon flux that resulted in high dead time and random coincidence rates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early positron-emission scanners were based on the detection of annihilation photons first with discrete detectors [1,2] then planar arrays of detectors [3]. Building upon this early work, contemporary PET scanners consist of rings of rectangular detector modules [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Perhaps the most important downside to this design is the necessity to utilize large amounts of scintillator and photo-sensitive devices resulting in high capital costs, especially as the price of the new generation of scintillators (LSO and LYSO), continue to increase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%