Evaluation of a Diagnostic Encyclopedia Workstation for ovarian pathology

Abstract

The Diagnostic Encyclopedia Workstation (DEW) is a computer system that provides completely integrated pictorial and textual information as reference knowledge in the field of ovarian pathology. Thse textual component comprises information per diagnosis such as descriptions of macroscopic and microscopic images, clinical signs, and prognosis. In addition, the system offers lists of differential diagnoses and criteria to differentiate among them. The present study evaluates to what extent the system influences the diagnostic process in efficiency and outcome. Therefore, two groups of six pathologists each, covering a wide spectrum of experience in ovarian pathology, participated in the evaluation of the DEW. The quality of the resulting diagnoses was statistically analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank sum test with respect to five different viewpoints: classification, morphology, clinical consequences, duration of diagnostic process, and consensus among the participants. The results are discussed and it is concluded lthat classification and morphology showed better results when books were used. The evaluation experiment was, however, very rigid and negatively biased with respect to the DEW systelm. Positive aspects of the encyclopedia are the easy access to diagnostic and differential diagnostic information and the large set of illustrations. Insight is acquired with respect to existing bottlenecks and how they may be overcome. HUM PATHOL 21:989-997.

Tracking with virtual slides: a tool to study diagnostic error in histopathology

“…Therefore, providing annotated and classified reference images, to compensate for the lack of mental images of diagnostic categories, may be helpful. Almost all pathologists currently refer to images in books to assist with diagnosis; online databases of virtual slides or diagnostic images may assist in diagnosis by providing large datasets for comparison with index cases 21,22 …”

A Method for the Acquisition of Formalized Knowledge in Pathology

“…In practice the problem is often reversed: from findings to diagnosis. Therefore, a considerable searching effort may be needed to find a diagnosis which fits a particular set of findings [1]. This means that books, though most widely used for consultation, are not the most suitable media to handle the "inverse problem" of diagnosis making.…”