2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleh.2023.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a device-agnostic approach to predict sleep from raw accelerometry data collected by Apple Watch Series 7, Garmin Vivoactive 4, and ActiGraph GT9X Link in children with sleep disruptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That being said, the ActiGraph GT9X Link watch has shown good accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity compared with polysomnography (the gold standard) in other populations. [31][32][33] It is also possible that actigraphy may overestimate sleep for inpatients as a result of lying in a hospital bed; this bias is minimized within the actigraph algorithm by accounting for light-dark and lack of motion. Although the true effect size that we found was 21% rather than 25% as proposed in our sample size calculations, the 25% effect size was chosen a priori for clinical significance and still achieved statistical significance; our absolute difference of more than 1 hour between groups is likely more clinically significant than a percent decrease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That being said, the ActiGraph GT9X Link watch has shown good accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity compared with polysomnography (the gold standard) in other populations. [31][32][33] It is also possible that actigraphy may overestimate sleep for inpatients as a result of lying in a hospital bed; this bias is minimized within the actigraph algorithm by accounting for light-dark and lack of motion. Although the true effect size that we found was 21% rather than 25% as proposed in our sample size calculations, the 25% effect size was chosen a priori for clinical significance and still achieved statistical significance; our absolute difference of more than 1 hour between groups is likely more clinically significant than a percent decrease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%