2005
DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.6.539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a decision-making aid for parents regarding childhood immunizations.

Abstract: This intervention study evaluates a decision-making aid for parents considering childhood immunizations. Participants (women in 3rd trimester of pregnancy, n = 100) rated likelihood of immunizing their child, anxiety, and perceptions of risk of the diseases and immunizations. Individuals were allocated to intervention group (received a decision aid) or control group (received standard care). Ratings were then repeated, and further ratings were obtained when the infant was 10 weeks old. The intervention compare… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(31 reference statements)
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, these changes may occur without affecting intention to immunize or evoking anxiety in parents. Our findings, consistent with those of Wroe et al 16 , suggest that promoting 'informed choice' (as opposed to persuading parents to vaccinate) has the potential to be an effective public health strategy, as parents do not appear to have been deterred from vaccinating. In this feasibility study, self-reported uptake of MMR vaccination at three months post-intervention was 88 per cent which is lower than the level required to achieve population immunity but slightly higher than local 30 and national uptake levels 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Importantly, these changes may occur without affecting intention to immunize or evoking anxiety in parents. Our findings, consistent with those of Wroe et al 16 , suggest that promoting 'informed choice' (as opposed to persuading parents to vaccinate) has the potential to be an effective public health strategy, as parents do not appear to have been deterred from vaccinating. In this feasibility study, self-reported uptake of MMR vaccination at three months post-intervention was 88 per cent which is lower than the level required to achieve population immunity but slightly higher than local 30 and national uptake levels 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Wroe et al conducted a prospective interventional trial comparing the impact of a 20 page manual on the benefits and risks of childhood vaccinations to support vaccination decisions (intervention) to a less in depth 19 page leaflet published by the Ministry of Health (control). 46 Women in the intervention group were significantly more likely to immunize their infants on time compared with the control group (90% vs. 70%, respectively; P < 0.05). Sales et al evaluated changes in parental attitudes and vaccination intent after a school-based educational intervention on influenza vaccine by surveying parents before and after the intervention.…”
Section: Interventions Focused On Routine Childhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The concern about using decision aids in the context of vaccination is that encouraging people to deliberate about their MMR beliefs may affect their motivation to vaccinate. [11][12][13] However, increasing evidence, 14,15 including the findings from the recently published Detailed Evaluation of a Childhood Immunisation Decision Aid (DECIDA) study, 16 suggests that decision aids for childhood vaccination decisions may actually achieve both informed decision making and increased vaccine uptake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%