The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03343-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a concept to classify anamnesis-related risk of complications and oral diseases in patients attending the clinical course in dental education

Gerhard Schmalz,
Lena Brauer,
Rainer Haak
et al.

Abstract: Background Aim of the current study was the assessment of risk classes according to a previously established system to classify the anamnesis-related risk of complications and of oral diseases in a cohort of patients attending the dental student course for dental preventive measures. Methods Patients attending the student course between April 2020 and December 2021 were included. To assess the medical history, a specific anamnesis tool was used, wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As systemic risk factors and comorbidities like diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease and mental disorders are on the rise, the risk for severe MSI may also increase over time especially in the age groups most affected by these conditions [ 37 – 40 ]. Further studies are needed to identify potential risk factors and risk groups for severe odontogenic infections [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As systemic risk factors and comorbidities like diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease and mental disorders are on the rise, the risk for severe MSI may also increase over time especially in the age groups most affected by these conditions [ 37 – 40 ]. Further studies are needed to identify potential risk factors and risk groups for severe odontogenic infections [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%