Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(01)00159-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a computer based interactive diabetes education program designed to train the estimation of the energy or carbohydrate contents of foods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a computer-assisted diabetes program implemented in Germany, most participants incorrectly answered questions concerning the caloric and/or carbohydrate content of foods and meals even after the training program. 22 After a second repetition of the skill, Ͼ80% of the German participants still answered incorrectly, whereas in our study approximately 60% of participants identified the correct meat choice, 50% identified the correct milk and vegetable choices, 40% identified the correct fruit choice, and 20% identified the correct starch choice on their first attempt. When our participants completed this skill two or more times the percentage who identified the correct food choice increased for all food groups, most notably the meat and vegetable choices, which both increased to 75% correct.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…In a computer-assisted diabetes program implemented in Germany, most participants incorrectly answered questions concerning the caloric and/or carbohydrate content of foods and meals even after the training program. 22 After a second repetition of the skill, Ͼ80% of the German participants still answered incorrectly, whereas in our study approximately 60% of participants identified the correct meat choice, 50% identified the correct milk and vegetable choices, 40% identified the correct fruit choice, and 20% identified the correct starch choice on their first attempt. When our participants completed this skill two or more times the percentage who identified the correct food choice increased for all food groups, most notably the meat and vegetable choices, which both increased to 75% correct.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Some studies have suggested that people can count carbohydrate with reasonably accuracy (i.e. within 10-15 g or 15%-20% of the true value) (Brazeau et al, 2013;Mehta, Quinn, Volkening, & Laffel, 2009;Rabasa-Lhoret et al, 1999;Smart, Ross, Edge, King, et al, 2010), while other studies suggested that people were very inaccurate (Shapira et al, 2010) and at best only up to half of people could accurately estimate carbohydrate content (Bishop et al, 2009;Nebel et al, 2002).…”
Section: How Accurately Can People With Type 1 Diabetes Count Carbohymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have found 50% had taken an entry level computer course in school (average age 28±4 years female, 29±5 years male) (Fong and Kretsch, 1990), indicating a moderate level of general computer exposure. Lack of computer experience however is a key indicator of negative enjoyment of computerised dietary programs (Nebel et al, 2002), yet experience is not related directly to acceptance of use, and should be concurrently assessed.…”
Section: Usability Testing Of Dietary Assessment Websitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive outcomes for participants of diabetes education and assessment were found. Increased comprehension of nutrition messages and a higher degree of practicability were identified (Nebel et al, 2002). However, skills such as the ability to use a keyboard, mouse and or menus of a computer system do need to be considered when developing a program and determining its usability.…”
Section: Usability Testing Of Dietary Assessment Websitementioning
confidence: 99%