1991
DOI: 10.1097/00004356-199106000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a comprehensive assessment battery for stroke patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…33 Mobility was measured using the Rivermead Mobility Index, 34 the 10-m timed walk, and the 2-minute walking distance (both were assessed twice after 5-minute periods of rest and the average score was used). Walking aids were allowed for testing (identical for pre-and posttraining sessions), but not for training.…”
Section: Outcome Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Mobility was measured using the Rivermead Mobility Index, 34 the 10-m timed walk, and the 2-minute walking distance (both were assessed twice after 5-minute periods of rest and the average score was used). Walking aids were allowed for testing (identical for pre-and posttraining sessions), but not for training.…”
Section: Outcome Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cut‐off values were calculated using normal population. This method often leads to a highly sensitive cut‐off score but with very limited specificity especially in stroke patients where visual impairments are common [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major criticism of the FAST is its reliance on visual abilities for most of the assessment. Patients with visual‐spatial neglect and attention deficits were found to perform poorly on the FAST despite having normal language function [11,12]. As neglect and impaired attention are common associations with non‐dominant hemisphere stroke, this problem brings the specificity of FAST into question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No que diz respeito à primeira questão de pesquisa dessa revisão sistemática sobre quais instrumentos de avaliação da comunicação breve são utilizados para a população adulta, foram encontrados dez instrumentos. Durante o processo de análise verificou-se que os testes relatados nos artigos diferenciam entre screenings [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]27,31,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] e avaliações breves 26,[28][29][30]32 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified