1990
DOI: 10.1002/ppsc.19900070119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Commercial Instrument of Sedimentation Field Flow Fractionation

Abstract: The analysis of particles in the sub‐micron range by sedimentation field flow fractionation (SFFF) is not new, but its commercial exploitation is recent. This inevitably will lead to a rigorous evaluation of the technique by many laboratories, for many applications, as well as to rapid development. This paper describes first an evaluation of the new commercial instrument using both ideal and real materials. These experiments lead to a discussion of the software package and of the influence of experimental cond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This "standard" theory by Giddings et al has advantages because it requires only the densities of particles and the eluent and experimental operation conditions, such as the flow rate, the strength of external field, temperature, and the channel dimensions. The average particle sizes converted by this theory from the retention times measured by using an aqueous solution with 0.1% Aerosol OT (AOT) surfactant as the eluent were generally found to agree well with the values obtained from the suppliers, quasi-elastic light-scattering spectroscopy (QELS), and/or electron microscopy, although SdFFF tended to give sizes somewhat smaller than other techniques (7)(8)(9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This "standard" theory by Giddings et al has advantages because it requires only the densities of particles and the eluent and experimental operation conditions, such as the flow rate, the strength of external field, temperature, and the channel dimensions. The average particle sizes converted by this theory from the retention times measured by using an aqueous solution with 0.1% Aerosol OT (AOT) surfactant as the eluent were generally found to agree well with the values obtained from the suppliers, quasi-elastic light-scattering spectroscopy (QELS), and/or electron microscopy, although SdFFF tended to give sizes somewhat smaller than other techniques (7)(8)(9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%