1988
DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(88)90059-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Candida antigen detection test (Cand-TecTM) in the diagnosis of deep candidiasis in neutropenic patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Results given by antigen detection with the Platelia Ò ELISA for a limited number of sera showed a higher sensitivity than the Candtec Ò test. The sensitivity of the latter was also largely lower than described in our previous study [14] but this discrepancy was not explained. Other authors showed sensitivities and specificities of 40% and 98% and 53% and 94% for mannanemia or antibody detection, respectively [6].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Results given by antigen detection with the Platelia Ò ELISA for a limited number of sera showed a higher sensitivity than the Candtec Ò test. The sensitivity of the latter was also largely lower than described in our previous study [14] but this discrepancy was not explained. Other authors showed sensitivities and specificities of 40% and 98% and 53% and 94% for mannanemia or antibody detection, respectively [6].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Similar results were obtained for both groups; by using a titer of 1:4, the sensitivity and specificity for candidemia were 64 and 72%, respectively. Several other studies either excluded patients with only candidemia (27) or presented the data without a separate analysis for patients with candidemia (20,25,31). Despite those encouraging results, other investigators have had less favorable experience with the assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAND‐TEC was chosen for the serologic diagnosis because only a small sample volume is required and the test results are promptly available. CAND‐TEC has superior sensitivity and a better negative predictive value but poor specificity, and thus it is thought to be useful when determining a treatment strategy …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAND-TEC has superior sensitivity and a better negative predictive value but poor specificity, and thus it is thought to be useful when determining a treatment strategy. 22,23 To date, there have been no studies on MCFG as a prophylactic antifungal drug in ELBW premature infants. However, in a previous study, FLCZ and MCFG were prophylactically administered to immunocompromised bone-marrow transplant patients, showing that MCFG had better prophylactic effects than FLCZ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%