2020
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Bayesian Network for Strengthening the Weight of Evidence to Predict Acute Fish Toxicity from Fish Embryo Toxicity Data

Abstract: The use of fish embryo toxicity (FET) data for hazard assessments of chemicals, in place of acute fish toxicity (AFT) data, has long been the goal for many environmental scientists. The FET test was first proposed as a replacement to the standardized AFT test nearly 15 y ago, but as of now, it has still not been accepted as a standalone replacement by regulatory authorities such as the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). However, the ECHA has indicated that FET data can be used in a weight of evidence (WoE) appr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data were then averaged for each chemical, resulting in 152 QSAR values representing modelled toxicity to juvenile fish. More details on QSAR model selection, equation acceptability criteria and results can be found in (Lillicrap et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Data were then averaged for each chemical, resulting in 152 QSAR values representing modelled toxicity to juvenile fish. More details on QSAR model selection, equation acceptability criteria and results can be found in (Lillicrap et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BN model is structured along the four lines of evidence (Figure 1), representing different types of information for a given chemical substance for which a user wants to predict the acute fish toxicity. The parameterisation of all lines is described in Supplementary material (Tables S.1-S.21), while more details on the assumptions are provided by Lillicrap et al (2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations