2014
DOI: 10.5194/amtd-7-131-2014
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a 2-step thermal method for separating organic and elemental carbon for radiocarbon analysis

Abstract: Abstract. We thoroughly characterized a system for thermal separation of organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) for subsequent radiocarbon analysis. Different organic compounds as well as ambient aerosol filter samples were introduced into an oven system and combusted to CO2 in pure O2. The main objective was to test which combustion times and temperatures are best suited to separate OC and EC. The final separation step for OC was combustion at 360 °C for 15 min. Combustion at this temperature proved en… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 14 C measurement on the EC fraction is still challenging. Only a few groups worldwide perform such analyses, and there are still open questions concerning the best approach for the EC isolation for 14 C measurements [Zhang et al, 2012;Bernardoni et al, 2013;Dusek et al, 2014]. However, a laboratory intercomparison shows that 14 C results of the OC and TC fraction agree well and are not sensitive to different isolation methods [Szidat et al, 2013].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 14 C measurement on the EC fraction is still challenging. Only a few groups worldwide perform such analyses, and there are still open questions concerning the best approach for the EC isolation for 14 C measurements [Zhang et al, 2012;Bernardoni et al, 2013;Dusek et al, 2014]. However, a laboratory intercomparison shows that 14 C results of the OC and TC fraction agree well and are not sensitive to different isolation methods [Szidat et al, 2013].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%