Photomask Technology 2008 2008
DOI: 10.1117/12.801663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of 32nm advanced immersion lithography pellicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Components such as pellicle mounting techniques, pellicle frame height, frame material and adhesive all play an important role in finished photomask flatness. [1][2][3][4][5] In particular, recent studies have shown that adhesive flexibility affect final photomask flatness significantly. 6 This has motivated pellicle suppliers to optimize adhesive properties and to evaluate new adhesives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Components such as pellicle mounting techniques, pellicle frame height, frame material and adhesive all play an important role in finished photomask flatness. [1][2][3][4][5] In particular, recent studies have shown that adhesive flexibility affect final photomask flatness significantly. 6 This has motivated pellicle suppliers to optimize adhesive properties and to evaluate new adhesives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%