2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration

Abstract: All fields of neuroscience that employ brain imaging need to communicate their results with reference to anatomical regions. In particular, comparative morphometry and group analysis of functional and physiological data require coregistration of brains to establish correspondences across brain structures. It is well established that linear registration of one brain to another is inadequate for aligning brain structures, so numerous algorithms have emerged to nonlinearly register brains to one another. This stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

46
1,748
1
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,027 publications
(1,830 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
46
1,748
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison across participants, we created a study‐specific FA‐template based on all available images using Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs) algorithms (Avants et al., 2014; Lawson, Duda, Avants, Wu, & Farah, 2013), which showed the highest accuracy in software comparisons (Klein et al., 2009; Murphy et al., 2011; Tustison et al., 2014). Individual images were transformed to template space using non‐linear registration with symmetric diffeomorphic normalization as implemented in ANTs (Avants, Epstein, Grossman, & Gee, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison across participants, we created a study‐specific FA‐template based on all available images using Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs) algorithms (Avants et al., 2014; Lawson, Duda, Avants, Wu, & Farah, 2013), which showed the highest accuracy in software comparisons (Klein et al., 2009; Murphy et al., 2011; Tustison et al., 2014). Individual images were transformed to template space using non‐linear registration with symmetric diffeomorphic normalization as implemented in ANTs (Avants, Epstein, Grossman, & Gee, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DARTEL is a fully deformable registration method that is effectively unconstrained by number of degrees of freedom. It has proven good segmentation and registration accuracy in comparison with other algorithms [19,20].…”
Section: Pre-processing and Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Preprocessing consisted of realignment (FSL), artifact rejection (RapidArt) and spatiotemporal filtering to reduce physiological noise (Behzadi et al 2007). Further preprocessing steps included band-pass filtering (0.1-1.0 Hz), registration to an individual highresolution T1-weighted anatomical image and normalization into MNI stereotaxic space using ANTs (Klein et al 2009). The data were resampled to a 3-mm isotropic resolution and moderately smoothed using an isotropic 5-mm FWHM Gaussian kernel to improve signal to noise ratio.…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%